Performance-enhancing drugs, paternalism, meritocracy, and harm to sport

Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (2):246–268 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No Abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
156 (#123,943)

6 months
6 (#566,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Rethinking the unfair advantage argument.Tena Thau - 2021 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48 (1):63-81.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Winning and Athletic Superiority.Nicholas Dixon - 1999 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 26 (1):10-26.
Paternalism, Drugs, and the Nature of Sports.W. M. Brown - 1984 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 11 (1):14-22.
On Performance-Enhancing Substances and the Unfair Advantage Argument.Roger Gardner - 1989 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 16 (1):59-73.
Boxing, Paternalism, and Legal Moralism.Nicholas Dixon - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (2):323-344.

Add more references