Review of "The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics" [Book Review]

Essays in Philosophy 15 (1):179-183 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.7710/1526-0569.1497

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on Ai, Robots, and Ethics.David J. Gunkel - 2012 - MIT Press.
David J. Gunkel: The machine question: critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012, 272 pp, ISBN-10: 0-262-01743-1, ISBN-13: 978-0-262-01743-5. [REVIEW]Mark Coeckelbergh - 2013 - Ethics and Information Technology 15 (3):235-238.
The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. By David J. Gunkel. [REVIEW]Dominika Dzwonkowska - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):91-93.
There is no 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (expanded & revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.
A challenge for machine ethics.Ryan Tonkens - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (3):421-438.
The morality of autonomous robots.Aaron M. Johnson & Sidney Axinn - 2013 - Journal of Military Ethics 12 (2):129 - 141.
Social robots-emotional agents: Some remarks on naturalizing man-machine interaction.Barbara Becker - 2006 - International Review of Information Ethics 6:37-45.
Can we trust robots?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.
When our mobile robots are free-ranging critters, how ought they to behave? What should their top-level instructions look like? The best known prescription for mobile robots is the three laws of robotics formulated by Isaac Asimov (1942): 1. a robot may not injure a human being, or through inaction, allow a human. [REVIEW]James Gips - 2011 - In M. Anderson S. Anderson (ed.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 244.
Architectures and Ethics for Robots Constraint Satisfaction as a Unitary Design Framework.Alan K. Mackworth - 2011 - In M. Anderson S. Anderson (ed.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 30--1.
A Vindication of the Rights of Machines.David J. Gunkel - 2014 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (1):113-132.
On the moral responsibility of military robots.Thomas Hellström - 2013 - Ethics and Information Technology 15 (2):99-107.
Framing robot arms control.Wendell Wallach & Colin Allen - 2013 - Ethics and Information Technology 15 (2):125-135.
Risks and Robots – some ethical issues.Peter Olsthoorn & Lambèr Royakkers - 2011 - Archive International Society for Military Ethics, 2011.
Implementing moral decision making faculties in computers and robots.Wendell Wallach - 2008 - AI and Society 22 (4):463-475.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
14 (#1,016,720)

6 months
1 (#1,511,647)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references