Pushing for Empowerment

Janus Head 17 (1):72-92 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The birth plan has become an increasingly institutionalized tool of Western birth practices, used both in medicalized and midwifery settings. Limited empirical research has been done on the efficacy of birth plans in achieving a commonly-ascribed goal: empowering women in their birth experiences. Still, less work has been done on the ethical dimensions of birth plans. As such, this tool has become nearly ubiquitous in birthing practices, yet they warrant further reflection. In this paper, I articulate the ethical goals of writing birth plans. I frame the birth plan as a narrative project: one that women are encouraged to write out, after careful consideration, as a kind of story that articulates the values, experiences, and relationships that are most important to shaping their experience of a “good birth.” Given the importance of the birth experience for many women, birth plans are ethical projects that the attempt to reframe and improve the deeper political dimensions of birth and patient choice. Birth plans are meant to structure the experience, guide women’s understanding of the process, and foster important clinical relationships. In this way, they are similar to advance directives, which are written to shape successful end-of-life care. Yet, the success of birth plans as tool for this ethical work is questionable. This tool aiming at women’s empowerment and ethical self-reflection often sets women up for a kind of ethical injury, in the attempt to avoid unwanted physical harms of labor and delivery. Birth plans are not legally binding, despite how they are framed as pseudo-contracts. Instead of resisting the challenges of a medicalized birth and to be empowered agreements, birth plans often set women up to fail, often aiming at unreasonable expectations. In my argument, I ask to identify for whom the birth plan works, and in which ways the birth plan experience can be improved. Finally, I address how the failure to give birth plans uptake during emergencies often undermines the patient-physician relationship, working against the primary goal of empowerment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Karl Marx—Metaphor for Self-Empowerment and Liberation.Jean A. Campbell - 2018 - Dialogue and Universalism 28 (3):179-184.
Words Underway: Continental Philosophy of Language.Carolyn Culbertson - 2019 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Habermas on reason and revolution.Deborah Cook - 2001 - Continental Philosophy Review 34 (3):321-338.
Unraveling and discovering: the conceptual relations between the concept of power and the concept of empowerment.Brian Thomas - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):443-463.
Culture and the Western World. [REVIEW]Van Yu - 2004 - Janus Head 7 (2):529-531.
Psyche as Postmodern Condition.Rex Olson - 2014 - Janus Head 13 (2):61-91.
A Responsive Voice.David Michael Levin - 1999 - Chiasmi International 1:65-102.
A Responsive Voice.David Michael Levin - 1999 - Chiasmi International 1:65-102.
Literary Historiography from National to European Literature.Nullo Minissi - 2007 - Dialogue and Universalism 17 (12):87-94.
Racism, Vulnerability, and the Youth Struggle in Africa.Paul K. Michael - 2021 - Dialogue and Universalism 31 (1):105-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-30

Downloads
6 (#1,481,650)

6 months
3 (#1,042,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barry DeCoster
Albany College of Pharmacy

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references