Authorship and manuscript reviewing: The risk of bias

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):208-209 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00011328

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.
Responsible Authorship: Why Researchers Must Forgo Honorary Authorship.Barton Moffatt - 2011 - Accountability in Research 18 (2):76-90.
Ethics of Using Language Editing Services in An Era of Digital Communication and Heavily Multi-Authored Papers.George A. Lozano - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):363-377.
Self-Bias, Time-Bias, and the Metaphysics of Self and Time.Caspar Hare - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy 104 (7):350-373.
Beneficial safety decreases.Till Grüne-Yanoff & Holger Rosencrantz - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (2):195-213.
The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.
Manuscript reviewing: too long a concealed form of scholarship?Carolyn Emden - 1996 - Nursing Inquiry 3 (4):195-199.
Effects of Youth Authorship on the Appraisal of Paintings.Eve A. Isham, Arne D. Ekstrom & WIlliam P. Banks - 2010 - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4 (4):235.
Measuring risk aversion with lists: a new bias. [REVIEW]Antoni Bosch-Domènech & Joaquim Silvestre - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (4):465-496.
Authorship Revisited: Conceptions of Authorship Around 1900 and 2000.G. J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.) - 2010 - Peeters.
Authorship policies of bioethics journals.D. B. Resnik & Z. Master - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):424-428.
The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation.Christopher Schwand, Rudolf Vetschera & Lea M. Wakolbinger - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (3):395-416.
Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization. [REVIEW]Mohammed Abdellaoui, Ahmed Driouchi & Olivier L’Haridon - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (1):63-80.
Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation.Morten Magelssen, Reidar Pedersen & Reidun Førde - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):678-682.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
9 (#1,259,126)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 24 references / Add more references