Edward A. Milne’s Philosophy of Science: Between Aristotelianism and Popperism

Roczniki Filozoficzne 67 (3):5-23 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article seeks to show that E.A. Milne’s philosophy of science has its roots in the philosophy of Aristotle and it could be an inspiration for Popper’s philosophy. The similarities with Aristotle’s concept are as follows: 1) the aim of science is to explain phenomena by discovering general principles; 2) the mind is responsible for discovering them, although experience guides the search; 3) deducing detailed statements from general assumptions is the most important element of research. On the other hand, Milne’s proposal is consistent with Popper’s main ideas: 1) criticism of the principle of induction; 2) preference for the hypothetical-deductive method ; 3) appreciation of falsification and confidence in the effectiveness of deductive logic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Edward Milne's influence on modern cosmology.Thomas Lepeltier - 2006 - Annals of Science 63 (4):471-481.
Before cosmophysics: E.A. Milne on mathematics and physics.Helge Kragh & Simon Rebsdorf - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):35-50.
Edwarda A. Milne’a ujęcie zasady kosmologicznej.Dariusz Dąbek - 2004 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 52 (1):163-180.
J. Jeans’ Idealism About Space And Its Influences On E.A. Milne At The Dawn Of Modern Cosmology.Giovanni Macchia - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2):303-315.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | Vol 73, No 3.Professor: E. A. Milne & R. S. F. - 1950 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1 (3):256-256.
Edward Arthur Milne—The relations of mathematics to science.S. Rebsdorf & H. Kragh - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):51-64.
A note on Popper, propensities, and the two-slit experiment.Peter Milne - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):66-70.
Edward Arthur Milne—The relations of mathematics to science.S. Rebsdorf & H. Kragh - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):51-64.
Professor Milne's Reply.E. A. Milne - 1942 - Philosophy 17 (65):78-.
The Social Philosophy of English Idealism. [REVIEW]B. S. J. - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (3):584-585.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-02

Downloads
7 (#1,403,593)

6 months
2 (#1,240,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the method of theoretical physics.Albert Einstein - 1934 - Philosophy of Science 1 (2):163-169.
Edward Milne's influence on modern cosmology.Thomas Lepeltier - 2006 - Annals of Science 63 (4):471-481.
Methodology and the birth of modern cosmological inquiry.George Gale & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (3):279-296.
The evolution of theories of space-time and mechanics.W. H. McCrea - 1939 - Philosophy of Science 6 (2):137-162.

View all 10 references / Add more references