Induction and Deduction in the Philosophy of Science: A Critical Account since the Methodenstreit

Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 11:1-15 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ever since Aristotle it has been accepted that there exists a combination of inductive and deductive reasoning and a sort of unified inductive-deductive methodology. If one analyzes the procedures and logic of scientific explanation and the methods of generating and justifying scientific knowledge, one recognizes the prototype of philosophy of science found in Aristotle’s inductive and deductive procedure that is described in his Posterior Analytics, Physics and Metaphysics, where heviewed scientific inquiry as a progression from observations to general principles and back to observation. He maintained that the scientist should induce explanatory principles from the phenomena to be explained, and then deduce statements about the phenomena from premisses which include these principles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,705

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How (Not) to Justify Induction.Dale Jacquette - 2011 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):1-18.
Induction and reasoning to the best explanation.Richard A. Fumerton - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):589-600.
Deductive and inductive arguments.Kevin C. Klement - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Demonstrative Induction and the Skeleton of Inference.P. D. Magnus - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):303-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
12 (#1,106,082)

6 months
4 (#845,567)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Friedrich Stadler
University of Vienna

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references