Suárez y quienes negaron el intelecto agente en el s. XVI

Scientia et Fides 5 (1):117-140 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suárez and who denied the agent intellect in s. XVI: In this paper three theses on the agent intellect of various Renaissance writers are studied: a) those that deny the real distinction between one and another intellect: Jacques Lefèvre d'Étaples, Francisco Suárez, and Gabriel Vázquez. b) those who admitted only a formal distinction: Philip Melanchthon, John Velcurio and Rudolph Goclenius. c) those who accepted only one nominal distinction: Gómez Pereira, John Eck and Augustin Faba.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.12775/setf.2017.005

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

El intelecto agente según "Alphonsi, Archiepiscopi Toletani". Un caso excepcional de "habitualismo".Juan Fernando Sellés - 2009 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 16:95-122.
El intelecto agente como acto de ser personal.Juan Fernando Sellés - 2012 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 45:35-63.
Negaciones de la distinción real entre el intelecto agente y el posible en el s. XIV.Juan Fernando Sellés - 2012 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 29 (2):511-526.
La voluntad como primer principio de la ley natural en Suárez.Mauricio Lecón Rosales - 2017 - Scientia et Fides 5 (1):165-186.
Alma E Intelecto Em Ibn Sin> A >.Miguel Filho - 2005 - Hypnos. Revista Do Centro de Estudos da Antiguidade 14:83-91.
Abstraction in al-F'r'bî.Richard C. Taylor - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:151-168.
Abstraction in al-Fârâbî.Richard C. Taylor - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:151-168.
Law, Knowledge and Action in Suárez.David González-Ginocchio - 2017 - Scientia et Fides 5 (1):295-222.
Aristotle’s Immortal Intellect.Mark Amorose - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:97-106.
Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms.Luis Xavier López-Farjeat - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:89-102.
Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms.Luis Xavier López-Farjeat - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:89-102.
La prosecución Aristotélica de la doctrina del Intelecto Agente en los filósofos del siglo XIII.Juan Fernando Sellés - 2008 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64 (1):343 - 357.
Praxis and the ends of action in Suárez.David Gonzalez Ginocchio - 2017 - Anuario Filosófico 50 (2):371-396.
Agent intellect and phantasms. On the preliminaries of peripatetic abstraction.Leen Spruit - 2004 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):125-146.
Alejandro de Afrodisias, Acerca del intelecto.José Manuel García Valverde - 2011 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 28:23-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-06

Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Περι ερμηνειασ].H. G. Aristoteles - 2015 - In Hermeneutik / Peri Hermeneias. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 66-66.
El entendimiento agente en Francisco Suárez.Andrés Grau Arau - 2002 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 9:185-204.

Add more references