Pragmatic Commitments to Naturalized Epistemology

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):477-490 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explores numerous and complicated naturalized epistemology against the background of pragmatism. We distinguish three programmes of naturalized epistemology: strong, moderate, and weak. By considering commitments of pragmatism on which different programmes depend, we point out the close-knit relationship between pragmatism and naturalized epistemology. We also illustrate the essential origin of today's controversy over naturalized epistemology and predict the uptrend of naturalized epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pragmatic commitments to naturalized epistemology.Cong Hangqing & Cheng Xiaodong - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):477-490.
A Dilemma for Naturalized Epistemology?Shane Oakley - 2011 - In Michael Shaffer & Michael Veber (eds.), What Place for the A Priori? Open Court. pp. 157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
23 (#681,424)

6 months
15 (#166,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hangqing Cong
Zhejiang University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
In Defense of a Naturalized Epistemology.Hilary Kornblith - 2017 - In John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 158–169.
On the de-naturalization of epistemology.András Kertész - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (2):269-288.

View all 7 references / Add more references