Overcoming the Conflict of Evolutionary and Naturalized Epistemology in Nietzsche

History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (2):181-194 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a difficulty in understanding Nietzsche’s epistemology. It is generally accepted that he endorses the naturalized epistemological view that knowledge should be closely connected to the sciences. He also holds the evolutionary epistemological position that knowledge has developed exclusively to benefit human survival. Nietzsche’s evolutionary epistemology, however, appears to imply a debunking argument about the truth of our beliefs that seems to undermine his commitment to a naturalized epistemology. This paper argues that Nietzsche’s evolutionary epistemology does not, in fact, undermine his naturalized epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Realism.Katia Vavova - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (2):104-116.
Debunking Evolutionary Debunking.Katia Vavova - 2014 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 9:76-101.
A Dilemma for Naturalized Epistemology?Shane Oakley - 2011 - In Michael Shaffer & Michael Veber (eds.), What Place for the A Priori? Open Court. pp. 157.
Evolutionary epistemology as science.H. C. Plotkin - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):295-313.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-12

Downloads
291 (#68,871)

6 months
62 (#76,154)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin Remhof
Old Dominion University

References found in this work

Nietzsche.John Richardson & Brian Leiter (eds.) - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Representation in science.Paul Teller - 2008 - In Stathis Psillos & Martin Curd (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Routledge.

Add more references