The structure of the paradoxes of self-reference, Graham Priest

The Monist 76 (3) (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Russell's Schema, Not Priest's Inclosure.Gregory Landini - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (2):105-139.
Definition Inclosed: A Reply to Zhong.Graham Priest - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):789 - 795.
Definability and the Structure of Logical Paradoxes.Haixia Zhong - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):779 - 788.
Inclosures, Vagueness, and Self-Reference.Graham Priest - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1):69-84.
Badici on Inclosures and the Liar Paradox.Graham Priest - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):359-366.
The liar paradox and the inclosure schema.Emil Badici - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):583 – 596.
Are there true contradictions? A critical discussion of Graham Priest's, beyond the limits of thought.Jürgen Dümont & Frank Mau - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (2):289-299.
The logical paradoxes and the law of excluded middle.Graham Priest - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (131):160-165.
Intensional paradoxes.Graham Priest - 1991 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32 (2):193-211.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-30

Downloads
16 (#927,647)

6 months
3 (#1,029,281)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references