Badici on Inclosures and the Liar Paradox

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):359-366 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Badici [2008] criticizes views of Priest [2002] concerning the Inclosure Schema and the paradoxes of self-reference. This article explains why his criticisms are to be rejected

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inclosures, Vagueness, and Self-Reference.Graham Priest - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1):69-84.
Explanation And Solution In The Inclosure Argument.Zach Weber - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):353-357.
The liar paradox in new clothes.Jeff Snapper - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):319-322.
Denying The Liar.Dale Jacquette - 2007 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):91-98.
Liar Paradox and Substitution into Intensional Contexts.Dale Jacquette - 2010 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):119-147.
The liar paradox and the inclosure schema.Emil Badici - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):583 – 596.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
115 (#156,646)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Metametametaphysics and Dialetheism.Suki Finn - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (1):128-146.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Beyond the Limits of Thought.Graham Priest - 1995 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The liar paradox and the inclosure schema.Emil Badici - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):583 – 596.

Add more references