On Fodor-fixation, flexibility, and human uniqueness: A reply to Cowie, Machery, and Wilson

Mind and Language 23 (3):293–303 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that two of my critics (Cowie and Wilson) have become fixated on Fodor’s notion of modularity, both to their own detriment and to the detriment of their understanding of Carruthers, 2006. The paper then focuses on the supposed inadequacies of the latter’s explanations of both content flexibility and human uniqueness, alleged by Machery and Cowie respectively.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When Weak Modularity is Robust Enough?Marcin Miłkowski - 2008 - Análisis Filosófico 28 (1):77-89.
Cowie on the poverty of stimulus.John Collins - 2003 - Synthese 136 (2):159-190.
Fiona Cowie.Why Isn'T. Stich an ElimiNativist - 2009 - In Michael Bishop & Dominic Murphy (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Blackwell. pp. 74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#199,344)

6 months
10 (#309,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile