Later Wittgenstein on Logical Rules

Filozofia 66 (2):109-121 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his remarks from later period, Ludwig Wittgenstein is frequently concerned with so-called external roots of our logical operations. He asks questions like: ‘How is anything like logical necessity possible?‘; ‚How is possible anything like following a logical rule under normal circumstances?‘; ‚Where is the compelling force of a logical proof coming from?‘; etc. In the philosophical community, it is generally accepted that the later Wittgenstein’s remarks deal with these questions, but the philosophical motivation behind these remarks is still not clear. Instead, there is a growing disagreement among various interpretations over these remarks. The present consideration is built upon the belief that Wittgenstein’s remarks try to communicate a new sense to us. I argue that, contrary to the generally accepted view, there is a new and positive sense in these remarks. My aim in this paper is to clarify the philosophical motivation behind them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and logical necessity.A. B. Levison - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):367-373.
Wittgenstein on Russell’s Theory of Logical Types.Daesuk Han - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:115-146.
Wittgenstein on Rules: The Phantom Menace.Scott Hershovitz - 2002 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (4):619-640.
Logical atomism in Russell and Wittgenstein.Ian Proops - 2011 - In Marie McGinn & Oskari Kuusela (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein on Breaking Rules.Guido Frongia - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 33 (1):263-284.
Wittgenstein's logical atomism.Ian Proops - 2004 - Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (65):374-376.
Carnap's conventionalism: The problem with p-rules.Thomas Oberdan - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):119-137.
Wittgenstein on rules and platonism.David H. Finkelstein - 2000 - In Alice Crary & Rupert Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein. Routledge. pp. 83-100.
Rules and Arithmetics.Albert Visser - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):116-140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references