Evil and Feminist Ethics

Social Theory and Practice 48 (3):457-484 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Claudia Card has developed a very helpful and highly-regarded theory of evil action. However, the theory isn’t able to distinguish between evil action and complicity in evil deeds as she intends. As a result, some actions which seem to be merely wrongful turn out to be evil on her account. The root problem is Card’s failure to recognize the importance of relationships for evil action. The solution is to draw on the work of other feminist ethicists, most notably Nel Noddings and Eva Kittay, and append a relational component to Card’s theory of evil.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,705

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A philosophy of evil.Lars Fr H. Svendsen - 2010 - Champaign, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.
Feminist Philosophy and the Problem of Evil.Robin May Schott (ed.) - 2007 - Indiana University Press.
Feminist Ethics.Sarah Miller - 2017 - In Hay Carol (ed.), Philosophy: Feminism. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Macmillan Reference USA. pp. 189-213.
Good and Evil in Recent Discussions - Good and Evil in Virtue Ethics.Katja Maria Vogt & Jens Haas - 2022 - Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 5 (1):83-88.
This side of evil.Michael Gelven - 1998 - Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-02

Downloads
31 (#528,290)

6 months
13 (#217,976)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Todd Calder
Saint Mary's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references