What is critical in the Anthropocene? A discussion of four conceptual problems from the environmental-political philosophy perspective

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 10 (3-4):190-202 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Anthropocene confronts environmental philosophy with one of the most urgent questions of the 21st century: How to maintain the earth’s condition in a way that allows current and future human generations to thrive? By asking such a question, ethical thought ceases to be solely a matter of individuality or morality. Instead, it raises a political issue: How can or should environmental philosophy relate to society in the Anthropocene? This article argues for a critical perspective that draws on contemporary historic materialist scholars and politicises societal power relations. It exemplifies this approach by discussing key-terms of the Anthropocene discourse, like planetary boundaries, tipping points, and space-ship earth. The article concludes that the idea that “we have to act fast now” would be dangerously too easy because it ignores the ambivalent character of human-nature relations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Sublime Anthropocene.Byron Williston - 2016 - Environmental Philosophy 13 (2):155-174.
Waiting for the Anthropocene.Carlos Santana - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (4):1073-1096.
The Politics of the Anthropocene.John S. Dryzek & Jonathan Pickering - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Labor as Action: the Human Condition in the Anthropocene.Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen - 2020 - Research in Phenomenology 50 (2):240-260.
Religion in the Age of the Anthropocene.Arianne Françoise Conty - 2021 - Environmental Values 30 (2):215-234.
The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives.Zoltán Boldizsár Simon - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2):184-199.
Learning to Live in the Anthropocene: Our Children and Ourselves.Susan Laird - 2017 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 36 (3):265-282.
The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate.Daniel Chernilo - 2017 - European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):44-60.
Questioning the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Is the Anthropocene Anthropocentric?Rangga Kala Mahaswa - 2020 - SHS Web Conf. Volume 76, 2020 The 1st International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (ICSH 2019).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-26

Downloads
20 (#769,678)

6 months
10 (#272,213)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary.Arne Naess - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):95 – 100.
Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.Elizabeth Anderson - 2014 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab.
The government of self and others.Michel Foucault - 2010 - New York: St Martin's Press. Edited by Michel Foucault.
Feminist social epistemology.Heidi Grasswick - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Whither bioethics? How feminism can help reorient bioethics.Susan Sherwin - 2008 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (1):7-27.

View all 15 references / Add more references