Not all Humans, Radical Criticism of the Anthropocene Narrative

Environmental Philosophy 17 (1):143-158 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Earth scientists have declared that we are living in “the Anthropocene,” but radical critics object to the implicit attribution of responsibility for climate disruption to all of humanity. They are right to object. Yet, in effort to implicate their preferred villains, their revised narratives often paint an overly narrow picture. Sharing the impulse of radical critics to tell a more precise and political story about how we arrived where we are today, this paper wagers that collective action is more effectively mobilized when we identify multiple agencies and diverse historical processes as sites in need of urgent intervention.

Similar books and articles

The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives.Zoltán Boldizsár Simon - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2):184-199.
The Anthropocene as Fetishism.Daniel Cunha - 2015 - Mediations 28 (2).
The Politics of the Anthropocene.John S. Dryzek & Jonathan Pickering - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The spectacular anthropocene.Andrew Kalaidjian - 2017 - Angelaki 22 (4):19-34.
Religion in the Age of the Anthropocene.Arianne Françoise Conty - 2021 - Environmental Values 30 (2):215-234.
A Tapestry of Concealments.Byron Williston - 2018 - Environmental Philosophy 15 (2):237-254.
Revamping the Image of Science for the Anthropocene.S. Andrew Inkpen & C. Tyler DesRoches - 2019 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 11.
The Sublime Anthropocene.Byron Williston - 2016 - Environmental Philosophy 13 (2):155-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-10

Downloads
4,273 (#1,408)

6 months
560 (#2,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hasana Sharp
McGill University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references