- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Rationality
New York: Routledge (1988)
Abstract
Professor Brown describes and criticises the major classical model of rationality and offers a new model of this central concept in the history of philosophy and of science.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Rationality and the tu quoque argument.Joseph Agassi - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):395 – 406.
Rationality in question: on Eastern and Western views of rationality.Shlomo Bidermann & Ben Ami Scharfstein (eds.) - 1989 - New York: E.J. Brill.
The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality.Karl R. Popper - 1994 - In Mark Amadeus Notturno (ed.), The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. London: Routledge. pp. 33-64.
Between Chomskian rationalism and Popperian empiricism.Stephen P. Stich - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):329-47.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
74 (#223,062)
6 months
12 (#213,779)
2009-01-28
Downloads
74 (#223,062)
6 months
12 (#213,779)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (4):608-631.
Realism and the Epistemic Objectivity of Science.Howard Sankey - 2021 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):5-20.
Counterfactuals and Scientific Realism.Michael J. Shaffer - 2012 - London and Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Why ethical codes constitute an unconscionable regression.Michael Schwartz - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):173 - 184.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-pjbg5 uwo