The Metaphysics of Conceptual Cognition

Dissertation, The University of Iowa (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the first chapter, I consider why it is we need a theory of conceptual cognition. Our experience of things often changes as a function of prior experience, even when the things we experience have not themselves changed. Thus, there must be something on the side of the cognizing subject that contributes to his or her experience of the world and is itself altered by that experience. This something is a concept. I argue that a concept, in its simplest form, is to be understood as a recognitional capacity. Furthermore, I claim that we can be aware of our concepts as capacities. ;After discussing the nature of conceptual development in Chapter 2, I go on, in Chapter 3, to explicate the need for providing a philosophical account of conceptual cognition. Why do we need a philosophical account, rather than, for example, a scientific account? I suggest that, inter alia, we need a general philosophical account of conceptual cognition, if we are to be able to assess the adequacy of any scientific account that is proffered. ;In Chapter 4, I claim that to recognize an X is to be aware of the X in experience as capable of recurring; it is to know an object as a potential object as well as an actual object in experience. I argue that this is to be understood in terms of our awareness of our concept of an X as applicable to other cases of experience. By using 'real potentiality' I mean to suggest that concepts, understood as recognitional capacities, are to be accorded fundamental, irreducible ontological status as a kind of actual states. ;Finally, in Chapter 5, I defend the claim, made in Chapters 1 and 4, that concepts, understood as recognitional capacities, which are themselves understood as real potentialities, are ontologically fundamental or irreducible. I consider various reductionist attempts to account for capacities or dispositions. I argue that all fail to account for the relevant subjunctive conditionals involved in talk of capacities or that they must themselves tacitly appeal to the notion of potentiality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two-dimensionalism and the epistemology of recognition.Markos Valaris - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):427 - 445.
Concepts and Imagery in Episodic Memory.James Genone - 2006 - Anthropology and Philosophy 7 (1-2):95-107.
Hegel’s Concept of Desire.Scott Jenkins - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):pp. 103-130.
Concepts and Cognitive Science.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 3-81.
Conceptual Combination and Scientific Discovery.Paul Thagard - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:3 - 12.
Empirical concepts and the content of experience.Hannah Ginsborg - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):349-372.
The Content of a Seeing-As Experience.Alberto Voltolini - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):215-237.
Mystical Realism: Epistemology and Nondual Awareness.Bruce Kenneth Hanson - 1991 - Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
Experience and Intentional Content.Ian Phillips - 2005 - Dissertation, Oxford University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references