Only stimulus energy affects the detectability of visual forms and objects

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (5):415-417 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A detection task was performed using different pictographic representations of objects in order to test the hypothesis that high-level information (familiarity) may influence detection thresholds. The stimuli were five versions of forms: outline drawings of objects, silhouettes, and three fragmented versions of forms derived from the outlines. The stimuli varied on two parameters: their nameability (easily nameable, hardly nameable, and not nameable) as assessed by a naming task, and their energy content as assessed by a two-dimensional fast-Fourier transform. The greatest amount of energy was observed for silhouettes, and the amount of energy contained in the vertical and horizontal spatial frequency components was equivalent for outlines and the three versions of fragmented forms. Luminance thresholds for the detection of the forms were measured by means of an adaptive method. The results show that thresholds were determined only by the energy content of the stimuli. High-level semantic or name information had no influence on the detectability of the visual signal. The results are discussed in terms of the visibility of spatial frequency components at detection threshold.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stimulus meaning in stimulus predifferentiation.Sheila M. Pfafflin - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):269.
Is no-stimulus a stimulus?Robert Fried, Livingston Welch & Miriam Friedman - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):145.
Objects limit human comprehension.Philip Richard Sullivan - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (1):65-79.
Non-Rigid Forms.Lewis S. Ford - 2008 - Process Studies 37 (2):68-73.
On the stimulus and response in pursuit tracking.E. C. Poulton - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
26 (#612,956)

6 months
2 (#1,203,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The face-detection effect.Dean G. Purcell & Alan L. Stewart - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (2):118-120.
A replication of the face-superiority effect.Jan P. H. van Santen & John Jonides - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (5):378-380.
Familiarity and nameability do not affect picture detection.Muriel Boucart & Glyn W. Humphreys - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (5):409-411.

Add more references