The “digital divide” is not a problem in need of rectifying

Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):393-406 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An oft heard complaint is that there is a digital divide: that some racial, ethnic and gender groupings have more than their fair share of access to computers than others. Commentators who articulate this perspective offer as solutions to this problem the subsidization of such technology for those who are supposedly underprivileged in it. The present paper denies that there is any such problem in need of rectification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The "Digital Divide" Is Not a Problem in Need of Rectifying.Walter Block - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):393 - 406.
Ethical gaps in studies of the digital divide.Kenneth L. Hacker & Shana M. Mason - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (2):99-115.
E-exclusion and the Gender Digital Divide.Georgia Foteinou - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (3):50-61.
The tragedy of the digital commons.Gian Maria Greco & Luciano Floridi - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):73-81.
On Rectifying and Rectifying-Switching Circuits.O. B. Lupanov - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (1):51-52.
Rectifying Names(Cheng-Ming) in Classical Confucianism.Cheng C.-Y. - 1977 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 8 (3):67-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
9 (#1,279,102)

6 months
1 (#1,512,999)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references