Philoponian Monophysitism in South Arabia at the Advent of Islam With Implications for the English Translation of ‘Thalātha’ in Qurʾān 4. 171 and 5. 73 [Book Review]

Journal of Islamic Studies 23 (1):50-75 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Qurʾān seems to be speaking to two different kinds of Christians. Those addressed in the early Makkan sūras do not provoke the rebuke that comes in the later Madinan sūras. This is because the Christians met by the Prophet in Najran were very different from those in Makka. Though South Arabia was staunchly Monophysite from early on, the sixth-century tritheistic Monophysite doctrine of John Philoponus was dominant in Najran during the Prophet's lifetime. The Arabic word for ‘trinity’ , was in use at that time, and yet never appears in the Arabic Qurʾān. This paper explores how the deliberate word choices within the Qurʾān distinguish between the trinitarianism of Waraqa b. Nawfal and the Monophysite Philoponian tritheism of the Najrani bishop, Abū Ḥāritha. The Qurʾān clearly addresses tritheists, and deliberately ignores the word ‘trinity’, a distinction missed in some contemporary English renderings of the Qurʾān

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ‘House of the Prophet’ or the ‘Mosque of the Prophet’?Essam Ayyad - 2013 - Journal of Islamic Studies 24 (3):273-334.
Orality, Literacy and the ‘Seven Aḥruf’ Ḥadīth.Yasin Dutton - 2012 - Journal of Islamic Studies 23 (1):1-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
26 (#611,461)

6 months
7 (#431,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references