Kerrey and Calley

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (2):139-152 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lieutenant Bob Kerrey, later Governor and Senator Kerrey, revealed in the spring of 2001 that he was being accused by a former military subordinate that he had ordered a massacre during the Vietnamese War. Kerrey denied most parts of the charge. If guilty, however, he would be a war criminal of roughly the same kind that a court martial found Lieutenant Rusty Calley to be. I examine the available evidence and argue that a court martial would probably find Kerrey guilty and I compare him in many ways to Calley.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When He Was a Young Man.Tom Grassey - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (2):163-180.
What Does the Conviction of Calley Imply?Donald A. Wells - 1971 - Journal of Social Philosophy 2 (2):2-5.
Rethinking the military paradigm.John McMurtry - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):415-432.
Rape as a Weapon of War.Claudia Card - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (4):5 - 18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
22 (#730,656)

6 months
3 (#1,042,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references