James Beilby (ed.), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (1):65-68 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/b:reli.0000014988.54579.c0

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Naturalism defeated?: essays on Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism.James K. Beilby (ed.) - 2002 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand: Plantinga on the Self-Defeat of Evolutionary Naturalism.Timothy O'Connor - 2002 - In James K. Beilby (ed.), Naturalism defeated?: essays on Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
James Beilby. Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism. Cornell University Press, 2002.Wiertz Oliver - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):222--226.
Conditional Probability and Defeat.Trenton Merricks - 2002 - In James K. Beilby (ed.), Naturalism defeated?: essays on Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. pp. 165-175.
Semantic Inferentialism and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.James Henry Collin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (9):846-856.
Plantinga’s Probability Arguments Against Evolutionary Naturalism.Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):115–129.
Response to Stephen Law on the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.Calum Miller - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (1):147-152.
Naturalism and self-defeat: Plantinga's version.N. M. L. Nathan - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):135-142.
REVIEW of Beilby, James, ed., Naturalism Defeated? for Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2002). [REVIEW]John Post - unknown
A user’s guide to the evolutionary argument against naturalism.Omar Mirza - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (2):125 - 146.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
What’s wrong with the evolutionary argument against naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
The Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism: An Initial Statement of the Argument.Alvin Plantinga - 2009 - In Michael Ruse (ed.), Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton University Press. pp. 301.
Plantinga's Innocent Assumption: Self-Defeating Naturalism, and Churchland's Response.Matt DeStefano - 2006 - Res Cogitans 3 (1):26-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
141 (#135,030)

6 months
10 (#308,281)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Draper
Purdue University

Citations of this work

Debunking arguments.Daniel Z. Korman - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (12):e12638.
Natural Selection Does Care about Truth.Maarten Boudry & Michael Vlerick - 2014 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (1):65-77.
Skeptical theism and moral obligation.Stephen Maitzen - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):93 - 103.
How Not to Argue from Science to Skepticism.Stephen Maitzen - 2014 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 4 (1):21-35.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references