- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism: An Initial Statement of the Argument
In Michael Ruse (ed.), Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton University Press. pp. 301 (2009)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: * NotesAuthor's Profile
evolutionary argument against naturalism Naturalism - view that there is no such person as God or anything like God Naturalism performing important function of religion - providing adherents with a worldview proportion of true beliefs among adaptive beliefs semantic epiphenomenalism - received view as to relation between belief and behavior Naturalistic evolution religion/science conflict - between naturalism and science
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Semantic Inferentialism and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.James Henry Collin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (9):846-856.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
A user’s guide to the evolutionary argument against naturalism.Omar Mirza - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (2):125 - 146.
Plantinga's belief-cum-desire argument refuted.Stephen Law - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (2):245-256.
Plantinga’s Probability Arguments Against Evolutionary Naturalism.Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):115–129.
What’s wrong with the evolutionary argument against naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand: Plantinga on the Self-Defeat of Evolutionary Naturalism.Timothy O'Connor - 2002 - In James K. Beilby (ed.), Naturalism defeated?: essays on Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Naturalism and self-defeat: Plantinga's version.N. M. L. Nathan - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):135-142.
Alvin Plantinga on Paul Draper’s evolutionary atheology: implications of theism’s noncontingency.Tyler Andrew Wunder - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):67-75.
Naturalized truth and Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism.Feng Ye - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):27-46.
Naturalism, Knowledge, and Nature—Alvin Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism in Relationalist Cosmological Perspective.Richard Peters - 2011 - Process Studies 40 (1):206-207.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-30
Downloads
250 (#82,106)
6 months
19 (#138,588)
2014-01-30
Downloads
250 (#82,106)
6 months
19 (#138,588)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Darwin's Doubts and the Problems of Animal Pain.Eric Russert Kraemer - 2002 - Between the Species 13 (2):2.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo