Schaffer's Demon

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (4):552-559 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jonathan Schaffer (2010) has summoned a new sort of demon – which he calls the debasing demon – that apparently threatens all of our purported knowledge. We show that any debasing skeptical argument must attack the justification condition and can do so only if a plausible thesis about justification is false.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-30

Downloads
154 (#125,276)

6 months
8 (#399,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nathan Ballantyne
Arizona State University
Ian Evans
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

The Basis of Debasing Scepticism.Joe Cunningham - 2021 - Erkenntnis 86 (4):813-833.
Debasing skepticism refuted.Earl Conee - 2015 - Episteme 12 (1):1-11.
The Debasing Demon Resurrected.Mikael Janvid - 2024 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 14 (1):28-50.
What the Debasing Demon Teaches Us About Wisdom.Kevin McCain - 2020 - Acta Analytica 35 (4):521-530.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.

View all 18 references / Add more references