Haptic Reductions: A Sceptic’s Guide for Responding to the Touch of Crisis

In The Case For Reduction. Berlin: Cultural Inquiry. pp. 39-61 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter identifies two contrasting methodological reductions utilized in philosophical scepticism: withdrawal/doubt [R–]; immersion/attention [R+]. Moving toward a feminist ethics grounded in phenomenological scepticism, Aumiller explores how reduction relates to experiences of personal and global uncertainty such as a pandemic. Reduction involves our entire embodied being, challenging how we are fundamentally in touch with the world. How we respond to being disrupted makes all the difference.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Touch of Doubt: On Haptic Skepticism.Rachel Aumiller - 2021 - Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Touch in the Abstract.Aden Evens - 2011 - Substance 40 (3):67-78.
The unity of haptic touch.Matthew Fulkerson - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (4):493 - 516.
Aristotle on Touch.Józef Bremer - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):73-87.
Aristotle on Touch.Józef Bremer - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):73-87.
Rethinking contact: the haptic in the viral era.Valentina Bartalesi - 2021 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 14 (1):23-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-04

Downloads
145 (#128,241)

6 months
69 (#69,621)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rachel Aumiller
Columbia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references