Intuition, Self-Reflection, and Individual Choice: Considerations for Proposed Changes to Criteria for Decisional Capacity

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 24 (4):325-328 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Liberal societies are built on a foundation of personal rights, including the right to make decisions about the medical treatment that one will receive or decline to receive. So essential to the liberal project is the power of individual choice that it will be abrogated only in the most extreme situations, in which persons seem to be unable to make rational decisions and thereby to protect their interests. A small number of decision-related abilities have been identified as relevant to the determination of when a person will be deemed decisionally incapable: understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and choice. It would seem prudent to tinker with these standards cautiously—if at all....

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Clarifying Capacity: Reasons and Value.Jules Holroyd - forthcoming - In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Health. Oxford University Press.
Evaluating Medico-Legal Decisional Competency Criteria.Demian Whiting - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (2):181-196.
Simple heuristics that make us dumb.Howard Margolis - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):758-758.
Decision-making capacity.Louis C. Charland - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Determining proxy consent.Richard O'Neil - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):389-403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-21

Downloads
24 (#660,486)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references