Philosophy in a Polycentric World

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (4):117-138 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the first part of the article, the author substantiates the importance of philosophical communication as a kind of dependent variable that does not have an independent meaning without pointing to something else through which the philosophy itself (often negatively and non-reflectively) defines. We are talking about global centers of “systemic” communication (politics, science, religion, etc.), imposing their observations on other communities. It is argued that the priority of philosophical communication is justified by the ability to carry out “universal observations”, which is deprived of all other communication systems.In the second part of the article, the methodological question is first solved about the possibility of explaining a number of phenomena (communications, observations), for which no indication of external factors justifying their existence is required. It is proved that the description and explanation of such phenomena is possible on the way of formulating “significant tautologies” (Peter Railton). Using this method, the author carries out a meaningful deployment of the significant tautology “philosophy is only philosophy” and substantiates that philosophy is communication, capable of defining itself in a universal way: through something else and through itself. The author concludes that philosophy can be considered as a communicative system (i.e.,observer), whose mission is to generate a unique product: a universal self-description of modern society, where philosophy combines three fundamental observational abilities: scientific, protest and artistic activity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Communication as an Epistemic Problem.Alexander Antonovski - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):5-24.
Communication as an Epistemic Problem.A. Ю Антоновский - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):5-24.
Radical Science.Raisa E. Barash & Alexander Yu Antonovski - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):18-33.
Radical Science.Raisa E. Barash & Alexander A. Antonovski - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):18-33.
How Is Communication Possible?Hsin-I. Liu - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:51-56.
Evolutionary approach to the development of science.Alexander Antonovski - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):201-214.
Contextualism in philosophy of science.Vladimir N. Porus - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):75-93.
Are There Cultural Universals?Kwasi Wiredu - 1995 - The Monist 78 (1):52-64.
How Is Communication Possible?Hsin-I. Liu - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:51-56.
Max Weber on Science: Reception and Perspectives.Alexander Yu Antonovski & Raisa E. Barash - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (4):174-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
3 (#1,715,316)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references