Is Deep Ecology Too Radical?

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (4):1-5 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The theory of Deep Ecology is characterized as having two essential features: the belief that nature is inherently valuable, and the belief that one’s self is truly realized by identification with nature. Four common but different meanings of the term “radical” are presented. Whether the theory of Deep Ecology is “too radical” depends upon which of these meanings one is using.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deep Anthropology.Alan E. Wittbecker - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270.
Regarding nature: industrialism and deep ecology.Andrew McLaughlin - 1993 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dōgen, deep ecology, and the ecological self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
The neo-stoicism of radical environmentalism.Jim Cheney - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (4):293-325.
How wide is deep ecology?John Clark - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):189 – 201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
79 (#211,252)

6 months
6 (#522,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references