Countersexual society -- Countersexual reversal practices -- Theories -- Countersexual reading exercise -- On philosophy as a better way of taking it in the ass: deleuze and "molecular homosexuality.

This article deals with the formation of both queer movements and theories, with the relations that they entertain with feminisms and the political uses to which they put Foucault and Deleuze. It also explores the theoretical and political advantages provided by the concept of « multitudes » over that of « sexual difference »for queer theory and movements. In contrast to the American scene, queer movements in Europe are inspired by anarchist culture and the emergence of transgendered cultures to counter (...) the « sexual Empire », notably by proposing a de-ontologisation of identity politics. No more natural base which can legitimise political action. The emphasis is no longer on « sexual difference » or « the difference of homosexuals », but on queer multitudes. A multitude of bodies, transgendered bodies, men without penises, dykes, cyborgs, butch girls... The « sexual multitude » appears henceforth as the possible subject of a queer politics. (shrink)

With the Farnsworth house, Mies van der Rohe constructed the first transparent building in history. But how could you live in it? Is it a building doomed to failure, mis-conceived ? Transparency, the blurring of public and private spaces, forced the inaugural resident, Miss Farnsworth, to struggle with the architecture, to inhabit it without giving into it, following risky paths through the subjectivation of gender and sexual orientation.

Can the abnormal become an expert ? Can the subaltern speak ? What kind of objectivity does the expertise done by the abnormal, trans, intermittent, handicap or drug-addict produce? What can be called « knowledge » in a post-organic time ? Taking as starting point Donna Haraways’ « situated knowledge », this text draws a diagrammatic cartography of displacements from dominant knowledge towards a multiplicity of local or minor knowledges as well as from the epistemological debate about feminist objectivity towards (...) a political genealogy of the production of knowledges. (shrink)