The aggregation of preferences: can we ignore the past? [Book Review]

Theory and Decision 70 (3):367-384 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article shows that a Paretian social welfare function can be history independent and time consistent only if a stringent set of conditions is verified. Individual utilities must be additive. The social welfare function must be a linear combination of these utilities. Social preferences are stationary only if, in addition, all individuals have the same constant discount rate. The results are implemented in two frameworks: deterministic dynamic choice and dynamic choice under uncertainty. The applications highlight that the conditions are unlikely to be met by individual preferences, and that they severely restrict social preferences

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2007 - Social Choice and Welfare 29 (1):19-33.
Multidimensional welfare aggregation.Christian List - 2004 - Public Choice 119:119-142.
Preference Aggregation After Harsanyi.Matthias Hild, Mathias Risse & Richard Jeffrey - 1998 - In Marc Fleurbaey, Maurice Salles & John A. Weymark (eds.), Justice, political liberalism, and utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 198-219.
Aggregation of preferences: The fuzzy case.Antoine Billot - 1991 - Theory and Decision 30 (1):51-93.
Preferences over consumption and status.Alexander Vostroknutov - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (4):509-537.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
98 (#177,620)

6 months
4 (#797,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?