Theory of Robot Mind: False Belief Attribution to Social Robots in Children With and Without Autism

Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

You and I, robot.Shaun Gallagher - 2013 - AI and Society 28 (4):455-460.
Should we be thinking about sex robots?John Danaher - 2017 - In John Danaher & Neil McArthur (eds.), Robot Sex: Social Implications and Ethical. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
What does the False Belief test test?Marco Fenici - 2011 - Phenomenology and Mind 1:197-207.
Pragmatic Development and the False Belief Task.Evan Westra - 2017 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (2):235-257.
The role of social eye-gaze in children’s and adults’ ownership attributions to robotic agents in three cultures.Patricia Kanngiesser, Shoji Itakura, Yue Zhou, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Bruce Hood - 2015 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 16 (1):1-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-10

Downloads
24 (#656,297)

6 months
10 (#267,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations