Analytic equivalence relations and the forcing method

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):473-490 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I describe several ways in which forcing arguments can be used to yield clean and conceptual proofs of nonreducibility, ergodicity and other results in the theory of analytic equivalence relations. In particular, I present simple Borel equivalence relations $E, F$ such that a natural proof of nonreducibility of $E$ to $F$ uses the independence of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at $\aleph_\omega$.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytic Equivalence Relations and the Forcing Method.Jindřich Zapletal - 2013 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):473-490.
New dichotomies for borel equivalence relations.Greg Hjorth & Alexander S. Kechris - 1997 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):329-346.
Continuous versus Borel reductions.Simon Thomas - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (8):761-770.
F σ equivalence relations and Laver forcing.Michal Doucha - 2014 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (2):644-653.
Equivalence relations which are borel somewhere.William Chan - 2017 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (3):893-930.
Popa superrigidity and countable Borel equivalence relations.Simon Thomas - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 158 (3):175-189.
Borel equivalence relations which are highly unfree.Greg Hjorth - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1271-1277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-12

Downloads
19 (#824,104)

6 months
2 (#1,258,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Classification Problem for Automorphisms of C*-Algebras.Martino Lupini - 2015 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 21 (4):402-424.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references