What Is It to Be Religiously Mistaken? A Pragmatist Perspective

The Pluralist 10 (3):292-312 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

philosophers have always been attracted to disagreements, perhaps because they almost immediately lead to philosophically exciting questions about how to distinguish positions, theories, and so forth, that are right from those that are mistaken. Philosophy of religion is certainly no exception, and, here, focus has often been on disagreements over belief in the existence of the God of classical theism as manifested in the great Abrahamic traditions, on the one hand, and atheism, on the other—though disagreements between religious traditions have also attracted attention. Particularly in Anglo-American philosophy of religion, these disagreements have generally been conceptualized in epistemological terms: Which (if..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pragmatist Epistemologies.Roberto Frega (ed.) - 2011 - Lexington books.
Using Multiple Means of Determination.Jutta Schickore & Klodian Coko - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):295-313.
Justifications and Excuses.Marcia Baron - 2004 - Ohio St. J. Crim. L 2:387.
Ethics and Normativeness.V. N. Sherdakov - 1982 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 21 (2):44-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-01

Downloads
35 (#458,412)

6 months
2 (#1,204,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references