Social norms and webcam use in online meetings

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Face-to-face meetings are often preferred over other forms of communication because meeting in person provides the “richest” way to communicate. Face-to-face meetings are so rich because many ways of communicating are available to support mutual understanding. With the progress of digitization and driven by the need to reduce personal contact during the global pandemic, many face-to-face work meetings have been shifted to videoconferences. With webcams turned on, video calls come closest to the richness of face-to-face meetings. However, webcam use often remains voluntary, and some participants choose not to turn their cameras on. In order to find ways to support webcam use—when desired—we analyzed how social norms in groups affect the decision to activate a webcam in a specific meeting. Based on an online survey with N = 333 participants, we found that social norms are related to an individual’s decision to turn on the webcam, even when controlling for group size. If the number of participants with activated webcams in a university meeting increased by 25%, it was 5.92 times more likely that an individual decided to turn their webcam on, too. Furthermore, 81.84% of respondents indicated they would turn on their webcam if participants in a meeting were explicitly asked to do so. The results demonstrate a strong relation between social norms and the decision to activate a webcam in online meetings. They build a basis for enhancing webcam use and enable a greater richness of communication in online meetings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Online meetings during the era of the covid-19 pandemic.Ilke Coskun Benlidayi - 2021 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 2 (3):170-172.
Empathy and Togetherness Online Compared to IRL: A Phenomenological Account.Fredrik Svenaeus - 2021 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 52 (1):78-95.
Online Public Shaming: Virtues and Vices.Paul Billingham & Tom Parr - 2020 - Journal of Social Philosophy 51 (3):371-390.
From the Guest Editor.Piotr Bołtuć - 2009 - Dialogue and Universalism 19 (1-2):5-7.
Global Learning Environment in Philosophy.Piotr Bołtuć - 2007 - Dialogue and Universalism 17 (7/8):149-158.
See you online.Lucy Osler - 2020 - The Philosophers' Magazine 3 (90):80-86.
Epistemic Norms as Social Norms.David Henderson & Peter Graham - 2019 - In M. Fricker, N. J. L. L. Pedersen, D. Henderson & P. J. Graham (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 425-436.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-28

Downloads
10 (#1,215,669)

6 months
7 (#484,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references