On the gradability of knowledge how, and its relationship to motor representations and ability

Synthese 203 (5):1-20 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I defend the traditional anti-intellectualist claim that a form of knowing how to Φ (e.g., knowing how to play the guitar) exists that entails the ability to Φ (play the guitar), and that this knowledge cannot be reduced to propositions (such as ‘S knows a way _w_ to Φ’, where _w_ is a means of Φing). I also argue that S can know how to Φ in the absence of the ability to Φ, and for this knowledge to be likewise irreducible to propositions. This is made possible when one distinguishes between type and token actions. Moreover, I contend that type and token actions, and one’s ability to engage in them, are differentiated at the level of motor representations. Motor representations provide an alternate means of grading knowledge how to that presented by Carlotta Pavese, insofar as this form of gradable knowledge is likewise irreducible to propositions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Know-How and Gradability.Carlotta Pavese - 2017 - Philosophical Review 126 (3):345-383.
Introducing Philosophy: Knowledge and Reality.Jack S. Crumley Ii - 2016 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
S5 knowledge without partitions.Dov Samet - 2010 - Synthese 172 (1):145-155.
Contextualism, comparatives and gradability.Daniel Halliday - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (2):381 - 393.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Gradable know-how.Xiaoxing Zhang - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Add more references