Comments on Professor Schouls' Paper

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):611 - 615 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are many echoes of Descartes and of other Cartesians in Locke's Essay. There is one particularly curious passage in the Essay which is clearly taken from the Regulae. This passage may be the one clear instance of the method of analysis and synthesis in Locke. Before I cite that passage, I want to raise a few questions about some of the claims in Professor Schouls’ paper. Professor Schouls is right to call attention to the need for some careful analysis of the concept of experience in Locke. He concentrates upon the form experience takes initially : lf“he means temporally first, as with infants, the examples he cites do not fit this concept. The quotes he gives on p. 583 all refer to adult, sophisticated experience, not to the learning experience of children. There is a rudimentary genetic psychology in Locke's Essay and in his Education. He does list some brief order in the acquisition of ideas by children, in the very earliest stages of experience, e.g., with the foetus, “some faint ideas of hunger, and thirst, and warmth, and some pains” are acquired.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on Professors Yolton and Duchesneau.P. A. Schouls - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):617 - 621.
Comments on professor Hartshorne's paper: Comments.Richard Rorty - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (21):606-608.
Professor Schouls' Presuppositions.Gary M. Kodish - 1971 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (1):48 - 54.
Comments on professor Putnam's comments.H. Margenau & E. P. Wigner - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):292-293.
Descartes and the Enlightenment.Peter A. Schouls - 1989 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Comments on Professor Benacerraf's Paper.James Thomson - 1970 - In Wesley Charles Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 130--138.
Comments on professor Postow's paper.Roderick Firth - 1978 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (1):122-123.
Comments on professor Derrida's paper.Richard Popkin - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (1):58-65.
Some comments on professor kahn’s paper.Stephen C. Pepper - 1950 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9 (1):51-55.
Comments on the paper by professor marjorte C. Miller.Antonio S. Cua - 1987 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14 (2):227-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
19 (#805,446)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references