Machine Learning, Misinformation, and Citizen Science

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (56):1-24 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Current methods of operationalizing concepts of misinformation in machine learning are often problematic given idiosyncrasies in their success conditions compared to other models employed in the natural and social sciences. The intrinsic value-ladenness of misinformation and the dynamic relationship between citizens' and social scientists' concepts of misinformation jointly suggest that both the construct legitimacy and the construct validity of these models needs to be assessed via more democratic criteria than has previously been recognized.

Similar books and articles

Exploring citizen science and inquiry learning through Ispotnature.org.Janice Ansine, Michael Dodd, David Robinson & Patrick McAndrew - 2018 - In Christothea Herodotou, Mike Sharples & Eileen Scanlon (eds.), Citizen inquiry: synthesising science and inquiry learning. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-03

Downloads
391 (#51,172)

6 months
292 (#7,574)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adrian K. Yee
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles.C. Thi Nguyen - 2020 - Episteme 17 (2):141-161.
True Enough.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2017 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Against Democracy: New Preface.Jason Brennan - 2016 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
A confutation of convergent realism.Larry Laudan - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):19-49.

View all 22 references / Add more references