Mathematics in economics: An austrian methodological critique

Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):44-66 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Even the briefest and most superficial perusal of leading mainstream economics journals will attest to the degree that mathematical formalism has captured the economics profession. Whereas up to the early 20th century virtually all of the output of the dismal scientists was in the literary format, by the early 21st century this is not at all any longer the case. Mathematical formalism is supposed to serve economics, and yet now true economic insight has been crowded out by the math. If mainstream neoclassical economics is to come back to its proper path, a far less central role for mathematical economics, statistics and econometrics will have to be fashioned.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Individuals and institutions.Peter J. Boettke - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (1-2):10-26.
Models of man: Neoclassical, behavioural, and evolutionary.Dennis C. Mueller - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):59-76.
The economics of ignorance or ignorance of economics?Paul Davidson - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):467-487.
Why the acrimony? Reply to Davidson.Stephan Boehm & Karl Farmer - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (2-3):407-421.
Boettke's Austrian critique of mainstream economics: An empiricist's response.Thomas Mayer - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (1-2):151-171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-10

Downloads
45 (#356,315)

6 months
4 (#799,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?