Sexual Objectification: From Complicity to Solidarity

Dissertation, 2017 (University of Es)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This thesis defends the diagnostic accuracy and political usefulness of the claim that women are complicit in their sexual objectification. Feminists have long struggled to demarcate the appropriate limits of feminist critiques of sexual objectification, particularly when it comes to objectifying practices which women both consent to and experience as empowering. These struggles, I argue, are the result of a fundamental misdiagnosis of what happens when women are sexually objectified, whereby the abstract notion of 'treating as an object' is called upon to explicate the kind of phenomena which can only be properly understood in light of a more general set of social norms of masculinity and femininity. A more accurate diagnosis of sexual objectification, I argue, is provided by Catharine MacKinnon's radical feminist theory, according to which sexually objectifying acts are manifestations of the social process through which women are made into objects of male sexual gratification. One important implication of this account is that women themselves play a role in perpetuating the norms through which sexually objectifying treatment of women is enabled: insofar as they participate in the re-constitution of the social context which facilitates their sexual objectification, they are complicit in it. Although this idea lacks intuitive appeal from a feminist perspective, I argue that understanding the nature of the contribution women make to perpetuating their objectification enables a better understanding of what practices of resistance are necessary for effectively combatting the sexual objectification of women. I defend the explanatory power of the complicity account of objectification in light of two pressing debates in contemporary feminist philosophy: the question of how women can disidentify from femininity given the strong attachments they develop to it, and the question of how feminism can continue to appeal to the motif of solidarity considering the anti-essentialist commitments of recent feminist theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sexual objectification.Timo Jütten - 2016 - Ethics 127 (1):27-49.
Sexual Objectification: From Kant to Contemporary Feminism.Evangelia Papadaki - 2007 - Contemporary Political Theory 6 (3):330-348.
Sexual Objectification.K. Stock - 2015 - Analysis 75 (2):191-195.
Treating Persons as Sex Objects.Linda Lemoncheck - 1981 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
The ethics of sexual objectification: Autonomy and consent.Patricia Marino - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):345 – 364.
Provocative Dress and Sexual Responsibility.Jessica Wolfendale - 2016 - Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law 17 (2):599-624.
Conceptually situating the harm of rape: An analysis of objectification.Lindsay Kelland - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):168-183.
Loose women, lecherous men: A feminist philosophy of sex.Linda Lemoncheck - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):369-373.
What is Objectification?Lina Papadaki - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):16-36.
Loose Women, Lecherous Men: A Feminist Philosophy of Sex.Linda LeMoncheck - 1997 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Subordination and Objectification.Ishani Maitra - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (1):87-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-11

Downloads
49 (#332,273)

6 months
5 (#702,332)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references