Standing Vigil for the Day to Come

Foucault Studies 19:217-223 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Michel Foucault’s “Standing Vigil for the Day to Come” was a review of Roger Laporte’s novel, La Veille, published by Gallimard earlier that year. Although Laporte’s work never received the wide readership it deserved, Foucault held it in high esteem, praising it in his assessment as one of the “most original” and “most difficult” of his time and, subsequently, urging Derrida to read it. This article is most appropriately situated in the series of literary reviews Foucault composed between 1961 and 1966, in which his marked attempts to understand the relationship between language and thought drew him to the works of Roussel, Klossowski, Hölderlin, Mallarmé, and, of course, Laporte. Foucault finds Laporte’s treatment of the subject-matter particularly satisfying because it provides a non-reductive account of thought and its relationship to language; thought is neither identical with nor distinct from language. Foucault sees Laporte as relying on an important Nietzschean insight that thought is both too funda- mental and too archaic to be reduced to philosophy or to require a Cartesian ego. In this way La Veille is naturally of interest to Foucault because it deals with the relationship of a writer to an anonymous other; it is this other — not the writer — that makes writing possible. With the role of the subject de-emphasized, Foucault finds in Laporte a starting point for talking about language in contemporary literature and thought in post- Cartesian philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Blocking in mental and motor tasks during a 65-hour vigil.N. Warren & B. Clark - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (1):97.
Discrimination decrement as a function of time in a prolonged vigil.Paul Bakan - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (6):387.
Understanding standing: permission to deflect reasons.Ori J. Herstein - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3109-3132.
Manipulation Arguments and the Standing to Blame.Matt King - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (1):1-20.
Standing Conditions and Blame.Amy L. McKiernan - 2016 - Southwest Philosophy Review 32 (1):145-151.
Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame.Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (1):118-139.
Vigil of Venus.Donn Byrne - 1927 - Classical Weekly 21:192.
Ecology challenge to religions.Jose Vigil - 2010 - Franciscanum 52 (154):211-217.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-14

Downloads
38 (#429,640)

6 months
7 (#481,211)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elise Woodard
King's College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references