- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Rationality ideals and mentality
Argumentation 2 (4):419-424 (1988)
Abstract
Mackenzie, this journal, this issue, convincingly shows that in certain dialogue games (commitment games) there are procedural restrictions similar to those that I impose on rationality idealizations. But, whereas my rationality analysis is set in the context of belief games, commitment games do not postulate beliefs. Is this significant? I suggest that mackenzie thinks that it is. There follow discussions of Psychologism and BehaviourismMy notes
Similar books and articles
Does murphy’s law apply in epistemology?David Christensen - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 2:3-31.
Happiness, Rationality, and Individual Ideals.Lynne McFall - 1984 - Review of Metaphysics 37 (3):595 - 613.
The limits of instrumental rationality in social explanation.Doug Mann - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):165-189.
Motivation by ideal : A reaction to J. David Velleman.Wibren van der Burg & Sanne Taekema - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (1):91 – 98.
Rationality redeemed?: further dialogues on an educational ideal.Harvey Siegel - 1997 - London: Routedge.
The elements of mentality: the foundations of psychology and philosophy.David Hume - 2003 - Chicago, IL: Distribution, IPG.
A Politics of Enlarged Mentality: Hannah Arendt, Citizenship Responsibility, and Feminism.Patricia Moynagh - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (4):27 - 53.
Machines, Sentience, and the Scope of Morality.Frederik Kaufman - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (1):57-70.
The role of the unrealisable: a study in regulative ideals.Dorothy Emmet - 1994 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-01-04
Downloads
19 (#820,758)
6 months
11 (#270,674)
2013-01-04
Downloads
19 (#820,758)
6 months
11 (#270,674)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
References found in this work
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.J. S. Bell - 1987 - In John Stewart Bell (ed.), Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-q5nzd uwo