The free Regularity of Imagination and natural Teleology. Kant and Aesthetic Cognition

Res Cogitans 11 (1) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The coherence of Kant’s socalled third Critique is ambiguous despite the task that Kant undertakes to solve in it. As the title suggests and Kant’s analyses show it is the aim of the work to determine the transcendental conditions of reflective judgment including the application of its principles on aesthetic and natural phenomena which do not fall under scientific investigations but which are still based on the cognitive powers of the mind. It is commonly agreed that an inner connection of the two parts of the work – the critique of aesthetic and teleological judgment respectively - is unlikely and that any attempt to argue that they form a unity is risqué2. Despite its relation to the powers of cognition the reflective judgment excersises its activity in two respects, namely in relation to aesthetic phenomena – the beauty of nature and of fines arts – and in relation to organic nature. These phenomena belong to strictly separate areas. Judgments about organic nature are teleological in the sense that they project a concept of purpose at the basis of the object for cognitive reasons; they aim at knowledge of how organic processes work. Against that, the aesthetic judgment is – Kant says – indifferent to the knowledge of its object; it concerns the beauty of the object just focusing on the object’s sensible form in so far as the judgment of this form occasions a feeling of delight in us. Whereas the teleological judgment thus claims to be objective, the aesthetic judgment expresses the subjective affection we experience via the judgment of the form of the object. It is this separation that I intend to question. I suggest that both aesthetic and teleological judgment respectively express ways of cognizing the world that do not exclude but rather supplement each other. More specifically, I argue that all through his third Critique Kant tries to keep separate what are really two different aspects of one and the same issue, namely the cognition of organic nature through a conceptual and through a sensous approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology: Form and World. [REVIEW]Lara Ostaric - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):pp. 147-148.
Causation in Reflective Judgment.Michael Kurak - 2016 - Kant Studies Online (1):12-41.
The significance of taste: Kant, aesthetic and reflective judgment.Robert B. Pippin - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (4):549-569.
The critic of free harmony of faculties.Ali Salmani - 2017 - Metaphysics (University of Isfahan) 9 (23):37-50.
The Relation between the ideal of beauty and dependent beauty in Kant's philosophy.Javad Amin & Ali - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 9 (16):43-60.
Possibilities for a Non-Ocular Aesthetics in Kant's "Critique of Judgment".Charles Edward Emmer - 2002 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Kant and the Relation between Imagination and Reason in the Beauty of Art.Reza Mahouzi - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 9 (16):177-196.
Aesthetics is the grammar of desire.Jennifer A. McMahon - 2015 - Aesthetic Investigations 1 (1):156-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-04

Downloads
8 (#1,318,910)

6 months
4 (#792,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

1. Einführung In Kants Kritik Der Urteilskraft.Otfried Höffe - 2008 - In Otfried Höffe (ed.), Immanuel Kant. "Kritik der Urteilskraft". Boston: Akademie Verlag / De Gruyter. pp. 1-20.

Add more references