Physics, theoretical knowledge and Weinberg's grand reductionism

Foundations of Science 3 (1):61-77 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The two main points of this contribution are the following: (1) Applied mathematical theories might complement physical theories in an essential way; some applied mathematical theories allow us to understand phenomena we are unable to explain by resorting to physical theories alone, (2) In the case of social sciences it might be necessary to account for examined phenomena by resorting to the idea of goal-oriented activity (the causal approach typical for natural science might be unsatisfactory). Weinberg's idea of grand reductionism ignores the two above mentioned facts and hence overestimates the foundational role of physics and its methodology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A priori conjectural knowledge in physics: The comprehensibility of the universe.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - In Michael Veber & Michael Shaffer (eds.), What Place for the A Priori? Chicago: Open Court. pp. 211-240.
The Role of Physics in Science Integration.Alexander Egoyan - 2005 - Albert Einstein Century International Conference.
Reductionism, emergence, and effective field theories.Elena Castellani - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (2):251-267.
Quantum field theories and aesthetic disparity.Gideon Engler - 2001 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (1):51 – 63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#638,434)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?