Pastabos apie Frazerio „The Golden Bough“

Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies and Art 91:66-81 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.24101/logos.2017.28

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the Ketner and Eigsti Edition of Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Frazer’s "The Golden Bough".Peter K. Westergaard - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (2):117-142.
The Golden Bough The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. Abridged edition. By Sir J. G. Frazer. One vol. 8vo. Pp. xvi + 756, with Frontispiece. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1922. 18s. net. [REVIEW]R. R. Marett - 1923 - The Classical Review 37 (3-4):83-84.
Schrödinger's Cat & the Golden Bough: Reflections on Science, Mythology, and Magic.Randy Bancroft - 2000 - Upa.
Bemerkungen über Frazers "The Golden Bough".Ludwig Wittgenstein & Rush Rhees - 1967 - Synthese 17 (1):233-253.
Poznámky o Frazerově „Zlaté ratolesti“.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 2006 - Filosoficky Casopis 54:561-576.
The Discovery at Madāʾin Ṣāliḥ: Myth or Artifact?Muḥammad and the Golden Bough: Reconstructing Arabian MythThe Discovery at Madain Salih: Myth or Artifact?Muhammad and the Golden Bough: Reconstructing Arabian Myth.Philip F. Kennedy & Jaroslav Stetkevych - 1998 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 118 (3):381.
Die anthropologische Betrachtungsweise. Zum Einfluss von James George Frazers The Golden Bough auf die Entwicklung der Spätphilosophie Ludwig Wittgensteins.Stefan Majetschak - 2012 - Wittgenstein-Studien 3 (1).
Remarks on Frazier's Golden Bough. By Ludwig Wittgenstein. [REVIEW]T. Michael McNulty - 1982 - Modern Schoolman 59 (2):154-155.
Developmental Hypotheses and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein on Frazer's Golden Bough.P. M. S. Hacker - 1992 - Iyyun 41:277-299.
Anthropology as ritual: Wittgenstein's reading of Frazer's the golden bough.Paul Redding - 1987 - Metaphilosophy 18 (3-4):253-269.
Doubt in Wittgenstein’s “Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough”.Andrew Norris - 2015 - Wittgenstein-Studien 6 (1):1-18.
A Critical Note on the Editions of Wittgenstein's Remarks on Frazer´ s Golden Bough.Andrzej Orzechowski - 1995 - Wittgenstein-Studien 2 (2).
On Wittgenstein's Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough for Jacques Bouveresse.David Sachs - 1988 - Philosophical Investigations 11 (2):147-150.
The golden bough.P. C. - 1901 - The Monist 11 (3):457 - 464.
2. Wittgensteins erste Auseinandersetzung mit Frazers Golden Bough.Marco Brusotti - 2014 - In Wittgenstein, Frazer Und Die Ethnologische Betrachtungsweise. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 62-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references