Realism is dead

Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):269-286 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Dead Bored: Debord’s Dead.Andrew Hussey - 1995 - Philosophy Now 14:22-23.
How the Dead Live.Niall Connolly - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (1):83-103.
Is realism dead?Ronald N. Giere - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):287-304.
Defining 'dead' in terms of 'lives' and 'dies'.Cody Gilmore - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (2):219-231.
Who's afraid of religion?Michael Murray - manuscript
Research on dead infants.R. S. Downie - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2):161-175.
The Turn Towards Buddhism.Michael McGhee - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (1):69 - 87.
Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule.Mike Collins - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.
The dead donor rule: Not dead yet.Laura A. Siminoff - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):30.
What we owe the dead.J. Jeremy Wisnewski - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):54-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
11 (#1,144,642)

6 months
1 (#1,478,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references