Severe weather event attribution: Why values won't go away

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 84:142-149 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naomi Oreskes, Why trust science?, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Davis Kuykendall - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (3):1-4.
Why the “stimulus-error” did not go away.M. Chirimuuta - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:33-42.
Weather, when and why?Daryn Lehoux - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (4):835-843.
Why the ‘A’ Word Won’t Go Away.Tom Flynn - 2008 - Free Inquiry 28:15-16.
Eric Winsberg. Philosophy and Climate Science.Vincent Lam - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (2):376-379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-26

Downloads
66 (#251,979)

6 months
10 (#309,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Eric Winsberg
University of South Florida
Elisabeth Lloyd
Indiana University, Bloomington
Naomi Oreskes
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Philosophy’s other climate problem☆.Michael Brownstein & Neil Levy - 2021 - Journal of Social Philosophy 52 (4):536-553.
Philosophy’s other climate problem☆.Michael Brownstein & Neil Levy - 2021 - Journal of Social Philosophy 52 (4):536-553.
How to make value-driven climate science for policy more ethical.Justin Donhauser - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):31-40.
A Rawlsian Solution to the New Demarcation Problem.Frank Cabrera - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (8):810-827.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references