Why are People Bad at Detecting Randomness? Because it is Hard

In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
22 (#712,914)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Genesis of Popular But Erroneous Psychodiagnostic Observations.Loren Chapman & Jean Chapman - 1967 - Journal of Abnormal Psychology 72 (3):193-204.
Informal covariation assessment: Data-based vs. theory-based judgments.D. Jennings, T. M. Amabile & L. Ross - 1982 - In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. pp. 211--230.

Add more references