No patents for semantic information

American Journal of Bioethics 2 (3):15 – 16 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1162/152651602760249996

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Peer-review and patents: Why the goose that lays the golden egg is a red Herring.Sivaramjani Thambisetty & Kartik Kumaramangalam - unknown
Pre-cognitive Semantic Information.Orlin Vakarelov - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (1-2):193-226.
GM crops: Patently wrong? [REVIEW]James Wilson - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):261-283.
Outline of a theory of strongly semantic information.Luciano Floridi - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):197-221.
Logical pluralism and semantic information.Patrick Allo - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):659 - 694.
Semantic information and the network theory of account.Luciano Floridi - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):431-454.
On Quantifying Semantic Information.Simon D'Alfonso - 2011 - Information 2 (1):61-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#455,854)

6 months
9 (#352,597)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How can you patent genes?Rebecca S. Eisenberg - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (3):3 – 11.
The two meanings of how and the Gene patenting debate.John H. Evans - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (3):26 – 28.
Sequence patents are not the issue.John A. Robertson - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (3):22 – 23.

Add more references