Moore's Paradox - One or Two?

Analysis 39 (3):141-142 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discussions of what is sometimes called 'Moore's paradox' are often vitiated by a failure to notice that there are two paradoxes; not merely one in two sets of linguistic clothing. The two paradoxes are absurd, but in different ways, and accordingly require different explanations.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/39.3.141

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Moore’s Paradoxes and Conscious Belief.John Nicholas Williams - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (3):383-414.
Moore’s Paradox is not just another pragmatic paradox.Timothy Chan - 2010 - Synthese 173 (3):211 - 229.
Moore's paradox, Evans's principle, and iterated beliefs.John N. Williams - 2007 - In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
Moore’s Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person.Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.) - 2007 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Eliminativism, Dialetheism and Moore's Paradox.John N. Williams - 2013 - Theoria 81 (1):27-47.
Moore’s Paradox And Self-Ascribed Belief.Byeong D. Lee - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (3):359-370.
Racionalidade epistêmica e o Paradoxo de Moore.Cláudio de Almeida - 2009 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 54 (2):48-73.
Moore's paradox and the structure of conscious belief.Uriah Kriegel - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (1):99-121.
Consciousness, reasons, and Moore's paradox.André Gallois - 2007 - In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
Self‐Knowledge, Rationality and Moore's Paradox.Jordi Fernández - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
4. Epilogue: The Legacy of Moore’s Paradox.Ulla Schmid - 2014 - In Moore's Paradox: A Critique of Representationalism. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 263-270.
More on justification and Moore's paradox.Anthony Brueckner - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):497-499.
2. Moore’s Paradox Revisited.Ulla Schmid - 2014 - In Moore's Paradox: A Critique of Representationalism. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 138-211.
Assertion and belief.Charles Sayward - 1966 - Philosophical Studies 17 (5):74 - 78.
Moore’s paradox in belief and desire.John N. Williams - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (1):1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-02

Downloads
61 (#268,641)

6 months
17 (#160,996)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Norms of Constatives.Grzegorz Gaszczyk - 2023 - Acta Analytica 38 (3):517-536.
Believing Things Unknown.Aidan McGlynn - 2011 - Noûs 47 (2):385-407.
Moore’s Paradox in Speech: A Critical Survey.John N. Williams - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (1):10-23.
Moore's Paradox in Thought: A Critical Survey.John N. Williams - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (1):24-37.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references